RETAILRETHINK [ INSIGHT ]
by Michelle Hernick Solutions Engineer, TrueCommerce truecommerce.com | 888-430-4489 The Cost of Disconnected Systems
Today, retail companies manage policy shifts, evolving compliance requirements, complex product assortments, and demand volatility at the same time. In that environment, disconnected systems are no longer just an operational inconvenience. What once showed up as a friction cost can quickly become a structural vulnerability.
platform and let the system do the work. But first, a company needs to understand its own workflows in order to define what that infrastructure should do. Building integration resilience means mapping workflows that govern how transactions move, identifying where manual touchpoints and translation dependencies live, and knowing which logic was built for specific supplier relationships and needs to be reconfigured for new ones. Organizations that pivot fastest from sourcing disruptions understand their own systems clearly enough to direct rapid change with precision. THE TIME TO ACT IS NOW Before the end of this decade, system-to-sys- tem integration between shippers and carriers will be the expected standard. Partners unable to connect seamlessly through automation will find themselves on the wrong side of that threshold. The companies that are ready will ask: • Do we know how our own systems work well enough to change them quickly? • Can we onboard a new trading partner when the market demands it? • Is our data accurate enough to act on when the window to act is short? The answers to these operational readiness questions will determine whether a company is built for today’s supply chain.
routes the transaction to the right person and holds it for resolution while every clean transaction around it keeps moving. When sourcing decisions operated on 12-to-18 month horizons, companies planned for a lag in inventory updates. But when a tariff shock compresses that horizon to weeks, the same lag becomes a different problem. The urgent questions are inventory visibility questions: What’s on hand, in transit, and committed from the affected origin? How long before we need a new source? If EDI transaction data and ERP positions aren’t synchronized, none can be answered with confidence. The danger isn’t a single wrong answer. A company that can’t see its true inventory position may over-commit to a new supplier to hedge against a perceived shortage only to have original inventory arrive and leave them holding excess stock purchased at a premium. Each subsequent sourcing decision inherits the compounding inaccuracy of the ones before it. Short shipments, missed delivery windows, and chargebacks follow. Integration resilience is often framed as a technology problem: Find the right
Why don’t systems just “talk to each other?” The short answer: They only communicate when they’re speaking the same language. That language breaks down in two distinct places: Internally. Each company’s Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system has platforms feeding into it and its own logic for how it expects to receive and process data. Externally. Transactions exchanged between trading partners, such as in EDI, must align with how internal systems are configured to process them. That gap is where friction occurs. With longstanding suppliers, companies may have built processes around known patterns. But when onboarding a new supplier quickly, those assumptions can break. Data formats may differ. Units of measure may not match. These events can stack faster than manual resolution can keep up. This is where the manage-by-exception model is essential. It’s an architecture that distinguishes between transactions requiring human attention and those that can flow without intervention. When a compliance check flags a discrepancy, it
August 2026 • Inbound Logistics 27
Powered by FlippingBook